tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3049495.post8937510016944655971..comments2023-09-19T04:15:49.206-07:00Comments on The Philosopher's Stone: Corporations: People, Entities, or a Hybrid of Both?azjauthorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07258812893943159574noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3049495.post-19862071959126580032012-07-16T11:05:38.525-07:002012-07-16T11:05:38.525-07:00This argument doesn't fly with me. If this is ...This argument doesn't fly with me. If this is enough to disqualify a corporation as a person, then what if we develop technology that allows a person (probably a wealthy person) to live indefinitely? Does that person cease to be a person? Does choosing to go through this process remove their personhood and legal protections, putting them under the purview of new rules? What if the immortalityazjauthorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07258812893943159574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3049495.post-24744624709029713842012-07-14T11:12:31.947-07:002012-07-14T11:12:31.947-07:00My problem with the "corporations are people&...My problem with the "corporations are people" idea is simplistic, but I feel pretty powerful. Namely, if that's true, then they're people who can potentially live for centuries, or even forever. Since people aren't immortal and can't live for multiple centuries, I think the idea is grossly flawed.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11919884634809933680noreply@blogger.com